Thursday, September 12, 2013

Blue Jasmine (2013/US)


by
Julien Faddoul

* (1 star)




wd – Woody Allen      
ph – Javier Aguirresarobe          
pd – Santo Loquasto      
ed – Alisa Lepselter          
cos – Suzy Benzinger      

p – Letty Aronson, Stephen Tenenbaum, Edward Walson 

Cast: Cate Blanchett, Alec Baldwin, Bobby Cannavale, Louis C.K., Andrew Dice Clay, Sally Hawkins, Peter Sarsgaard, Michael Stuhlbarg



Being a Woody Allen devotee has always had its bad days. Or veritably, its bad years. He has made, by my count, at least half-a-dozen masterpieces and I never tire of our annual meetings. This, however, is not the case for all, and many consider modern day Allen to be more of an annual chore. Flimsy characters, half-finished ideas, out-of-style jokes and a smug tendency toward cityscape traveloguing are all cumulative complaints that we’re all aware of.

But what one continues to wonder is whether Allen himself is aware of these. Is he in a particularly melancholic state due to a lack of inspiration and a fear of expectation? His latest film seems to suggest this at every juncture. But every director feels this, so maybe we’re over-thinking it (I mean, he’s always been frustrated, but that’s Woody 24/7). Perhaps he’s just been rereading his favourite Tennessee Williams plays. Yes, I think that’s it. For, with Blue Jasmine, Woody Allen tackles the question that all thinking men have pondered in their most sober, pensive and cerebral of times: Who would you rather, Blanche or Blanchett?

As Blue Jasmine film opens, Jasmine French (Cate Blanchett), whose husband Hal (Alec Baldwin), a rich businessman, has pulled a Madoff and is imprisoned (as far as we know). Due to this, Jasmine is dead-broke and is forced to leave her Park Avenue apartment and stay with her sister Ginger (Sally Hawkins) in San Francisco. Ginger, a divorced mother of two who works bagging groceries, subsists in an altogether different ecosphere from her sister’s and has scarcely beheld Jasmine since she married. Ginger has a fiancé named Chili (Bobby Cannavale, doing his Stanley Kowalski) whom – in an introductory lunch scene that ranks with Mr Allen’s most inane and least believable – Jasmine immediately dislikes.

Within the next few months, Jasmine resolves into an anxious existence at her sister’s place, eventually taking a job she had at first dismissed as offensively remedial: working the front desk for a randy dentist (Michael Stuhlbarg). When that doesn’t work out, Jasmine opts for a career as an interior designer. She ultimately resolves to take a computer course that, for no discernible reason, requires her to bear hours of torturous nightly study. During all this, Jasmine and Ginger fight non-stop. These scenes alternate with flashbacks of Jasmine's life in New York that lead to her demise (a final tip-off one can see coming from a mile).

After this, the film veers off into various subplots: Ginger pursues a romance with a tender sound engineer (Louis C.K.), infuriating Chili, while Jasmine, upon meeting a refined, prosperous diplomat (Peter Sarsgaard), proceeds to lie and concoct a different past in order to gain his last name on her bank account.

The film is always intriguing, and by always I mean even after it’s over. Mr Allen, who would most likely want to make movies than depend on the kindness of strangers, efforts to create a grand showcase for this character – or characters – but this circus seems to be much stupider than usual. Most of the men are idiots and the women, psychotic. The problem here is that Mr Allen continually has his characters merely indicate and comment on whom they are and what they’re doing. For instance, we are told that both sisters are adopted and Ginger insists her sister was always their mother’s favourite. Why? What was it about their childhood that instigated them to grow-up into two such different people? Nothing we see supports that and Mr Allen never goes into it any further during the film.

Jasmine’s behaviour is so obviously erroneous and foolhardy yet no one does so much as lift a finger to help in any mature or beneficial way. Instead, they just remind her (and us) of her personality. Ms Blanchett’s performance is a risky one. In order to convey her Blanche-DuBois-decent-into-madness, she dilutes herself into operatic gestures and fluttering reactions. This works particularly well in the film’s last quarter, but Ms Blanchett never successfully sheds the idea of the character to reveal the character itself and, in the end, the performance remains a stunt.

Ms Hawkins, Mr Cannavale, Mr Baldwin, Mr Sarsgaard and Mr Stuhlbarg are not given enough room – or perhaps time (Mr Allen’s famously truncated, “few-takes” production periods often result in half-baked acting) – to breathe their characters to life. Only Andrew Dice Clay (yes, that Andrew Dice Clay), playing Ginger’s first husband who reluctantly invested his lottery earnings with Hal and still holds a grudge when it dissipated, seems to exist in the real world.

Everything in Blue Jasmine was implemented much more successfully in Mr Allen’s 1992 masterpiece Husbands and Wives. Like that film, Blue Jasmine is a sad and tragic depiction of how untrustworthy people so consistently are with one another. But what’s most tragic is that Woody Allen can’t trust his audience enough to articulate a ripe and intelligent delineation out of, what is clearly, a mess.



Sunday, September 8, 2013

Crystal Fairy (2013/Chile)


by
Julien Faddoul

* (1 star)



wd – Sebastian Silva
ph – Cristián Petit-Laurent
ad – Mark Grattan
ed – Diego Macho, Sebastián Silva, Sofía Subercaseaux

p – Juan de Dios Larraín, Pablo Larraín

Cast: Michael Cera, Gaby Hoffmann, Juan Andrés Silva, José Miguel Silva, Agustín Silva
           

People help each other without knowing it. If this weren’t the case, dinner party guests would revert to Bunuelian savagery before the entrée. This must be where the expression “being there” comes from. But if we truly knew what being there for someone really did for them, more people would take credit for it more often. As Lenny Bruce once said; “the only truly anonymous donor is the guy who knocks up your daughter.”

I sense that this is what Sebastian Silva was trying to cultivate with his new film Crystal Fairy, one of two films by him that premiered at the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year, the other being Magic Magic. Both of them are set in his native Chile and star Michael Cera. Unfortunately, much like the glib, unconvincing Magic Magic, Crystal Fairy buckles under the weight of Mr Silva’s self-seriousness and never fully forms into the authentic comedy of young adults that it wants to be.

The film opens with an elegant credit sequence before we are introduced to Jamie (Cera). A quasi-nomad in Chile, Jamie is the plainly horrid American of this shiftless group of characters. Dishevelled and fizzy, his idea of fitting in with the locals is to complement them on their cocaine while at parties and to invite prostitutes to his apartment so he can cook for them. He doesn’t really seem to mind the language barrier, just as long as everyone in the room is as up as him.

Jamie resolves to drive north to pursue the San Pedro cactus, one of the world’s strongest and jubilant hallucinogens. He has planned this trip for a while (though not very well) with his three best friends, played by Juan Andrés Silva, José Miguel Silva and Augstin Silva (all of whom are brother to the director). Things go awry however when, while high, Jamie carelessly offers an idiotic, flower-child American girl who calls herself Crystal Fairy (Gaby Hoffmann) to juncture along with them.

Crystal Fairy turns out to be quite a nuisance; she doesn’t seem to like clothes – at least not for her – and chides the others for the snacks they eat. Jamie even suggests ditching her at a hostel. But ultimately Crystal’s true aptitude reveals itself and the gang arrives at emotive divinity.

This is also, as expected, due to the natural becoming of their surroundings. Mr Silva’s pace is unhurried, as his characters inhale the Chilean landscapes. What he is trying to do is indulge in the suspension of the emotions that are being displayed. We are never quite sure of what these emotions are, but Mr Silva feels that this is matching not experimental. Both Mr Cera and Ms Hoffmann are quite brave here, taking on quite cloudy roles with reverence.

The entire film is stripped down. Mr Silva has shot in sequence with his actors having to either improvise most of the dialogue or feed it to them just before a take. This quixotic, meandering gabble and the film’s themes of the emotionality of life are not in balance with one another. Many have found the film’s end to be a very moving, when in reality it is merely the film’s only direct moment. Because of this, Crystal Fairy never breeds from its first scene. This is fine for some movies, but not for this one; not for one that feels this substantial.

Crystal Fairy was made on the fly while Mr Silva and Mr Cera were waiting for financing for Magic Magic to come together, and on that level, it is an accomplished work. The Maid, Mr Silva’s 2009 drama about a Chilean maid trying to hold her position after 23 years, remains his best, most complete work. And one feels that he has another film on that level waiting to emerge from him. Crystal Fairy falls just a tad short.