by
Julien
Faddoul
* (1
star)
d –
Colin Trevorrow
w – Rick
Jaffa, Amanda Silver, Colin Trevorrow, Derek Connolly (Based on the Characters Created by Michael
Crichton)
ph –
John Schwartzman
pd – Ed
Verreaux
m –
Michael Giacchino
ed –
Kevin Stitt
cos – April
Ferry, Daniel Orlandi
p –
Patrick Crowley, Frank Marshall
Cast: Chris
Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Irrfan Khan, Vincent D'Onofrio, Ty Simpkins, Nick
Robinson, Jake Johnson, Omar Sy, BD Wong, Judy Greer, Lauren Lapkus, Brian Tee,
Katie McGrath, Andy Buckley, Eric Edelstein
Were
dinosaurs ever really that interesting? Few subjects of science are
as fascinating to the public as dinosaurs. The study of dinosaurs stretches our
imaginations, gives us new perspectives on time and space, and invites us to
discover worlds very different from our modern Earth. So why is that they are such
stodgy adversaries in movies?
Before
I continue I should specify that I have never been convinced of the importance
of the original Jurassic Park (1993), an inflated monster movie that,
with the current tier of cultural regulators being those who were the target
teenage audience for that film at the time of its release, has become grossly
overrated. Other than the film’s leading-edge special effects – an
inevitability of cinematic technology and one that really should not be
credited to any single movie – and the occasional Spielbergian touch for
effective wonder and scares, the film, on a plot, character and performance
level, is fairly embarrassing. Of course, every time I bring this up with
people in my age group I am harangued for my unfounded foolishness. Yeah,
whatever.
One
of the major problems with the 1993 film, as well as others, is that dinosaurs
themselves haven’t ever been portrayed as anything other than killing machines;
stock antagonists that give every excuse for characters to scream, run and hide
because, well, they’re dinosaurs! And when that isn’t happening, we are
subjected to the always colorful oratory on how a Velociraptor or a T-Rex would
exactly do away with a life so that, you know, the audience gets it. At least
dragons can breathe fire.
What
makes Jurassic World, the 3rd sequel to Mr Spielberg’s film
and the first in 14 years, particularly embarrassing is that the special
effects haven’t really improved that much since 1993 and neither have the depth
of character. So we are left to see how the filmmakers pass the venerable test
of matching artistry with technique. Sadly, Jurassic World ends up
collapsing into the hole of blockbuster movie tedium.
Owen
Grady (Chris Pratt), who likes to make wisecracks with a serious face that some
might find adorable, is a Navy velociraptor-trainer residing somewhat
detachedly on Isla Nubar off the coast of Costa Rica. This is also the home to
Jurassic World, an actual, operational version of the dinosaur theme park that
the characters in the first films always found ways to screw-up.
Some
of the entertainment they have there include interactive pavilions (with
corporate sponsors), an aviary, monorails that zip you from a fancy hotel to a
water tank, a petting area, and that place where you get to ride in gyro-sphere
vehicles. The park/world is owned by visionary Simon Masrani (Irrfan Khan) who,
of course, believes tampering with the process of evolution is a fruitful and
profitable idea. The park's Operations Manager, Claire (Bryce Dallas Howard),
is a no-nonsense administrator who has been ordered by Masrani to commission
the creation of The Indominus Rex, a hybrid dinosaur that will no doubt do well
to expand the park’s notoriety. She also has to deal with her two nephews, Zach
(Nick Robinson) and Gray (Ty Simpkins), whom she immediately dumps on her
assistant (Katie McGrath).
Its
painfully clear from the animal’s introduction that director and co-writer
Colin Trevorrow intended The Indominus Rex to be symbolic of consumer and
corporate overload. It is an animal designed from a series of focus groups. In
fact, Jurassic World has a peculiarly sardonic tone in its first half,
with Mr Trevorrow cleverly depicting the workings of the park and the
reaction/behavior of the consumers to be an unmistakable parallel to the
current film industry.
Of
course, Indominus Rex becomes too difficult to handle and wreaks havoc on the
park where once again civilians are eaten alive and once again hordes of
characters run and scream and hide, presumably because of the all the, you
know, dinosaurs. The film has the stink of retread emanating throughout. You
have seen this movie three times already and yada, yada. The complaints never
seem to change. The film has some effective moments of action, Mr Pratt, Ms
Howard and Mr Khan aren’t bad (the cast as a whole is actually superior to any
previous Jurassic film), but every beat is foreseeable and the fact that Mr
Trevorrow makes a number of shot and situation references to the first film
doesn’t help matters.
One
is better off watching last year’s Godzilla (2014) at home – who
incidentally is a giant Kaijū, not a dinosaur. Okay? Big difference – which handled
similar material with more clarity and force. Dinosaurs are fascinating
creatures that can institute an endless amount of captivating mythology. It
would have been nice if Jurassic World were made with a sense of awe
that comes from dealing with dinosaurs, rather than the sense of obligation
that comes from dealing with a box-office sequel. Though I’m sure we can all
agree that the greatest dinosaur in the history of cinema is the one from Meet
the Robinsons (2007).
No comments:
Post a Comment